<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Slanted Viewpoint &#187; Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/category/science/religion/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint</link>
	<description>Ted Landau on Apple, politics, evolution, movies &#38; whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence, Evolution and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2011/836</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2011/836#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the most recent Sunday New York Times, Frank Bruni argues that being “smart”, at least in the scholarly academic intellectual sense that President Obama is generally considered to be smart, is not a guarantee that a President will be a strong leader, or always make wise policy decisions, or have the ability to effectively]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2011/836/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Atheist) Signs for Our Times</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/165</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a New York Times column, Nicholas Kristof expresses hope that a new crop of books, with titles like &#8220;The Case for God,&#8221; will lead to a truce in the &#8220;religious wars.&#8221; This is just one of several articles I have read recently — that all seem to suggest that prominent atheists (such as Richard]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/165/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicholas Wade on Evolution: Strike Two</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, the New York Times ran a review of Richard Dawkin&#8217;s latest book on evolution, The Greatest Show on Earth. The review, written by Nicholas Wade, had a very troubling slant. In what I view as its most grievous error, Wade contended that Dawkins &#8220;doesn’t know what a theory is,&#8221; In saying]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR flunks evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/80</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/80#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a slightly edited copy of feedback I sent to NPR earlier this week. It&#8217;s probably a bit more harsh than they deserved. But I felt I needed to do some shaking here. &#8220;I was truly disappointed in your coverage of the Florida evolution bill issue today. Even the title of your piece,]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/80/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

