<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Slanted Viewpoint &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/category/science/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint</link>
	<description>Ted Landau on Apple, politics, evolution, movies &#38; whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Dover Trial Merits Top Ten Consideration</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/172</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/172#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having now read several &#8220;top ten news stories of the decade&#8221; lists, such as this one from the Associated Press, I was disappointed to see that one of my top choices was nowhere to be found.
What is my choice? It&#8217;s the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District &#8220;evolution&#8221; trial of 2005. Without doubt, it is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/172/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Atheist) Signs for Our Times</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/165</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a New York Times column, Nicholas Kristof expresses hope that a new crop of books, with titles like &#8220;The Case for God,&#8221; will lead to a truce in the &#8220;religious wars.&#8221; This is just one of several articles I have read recently — that all seem to suggest that prominent atheists (such as Richard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/165/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicholas Wade on Evolution: Strike Two</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, the New York Times ran a review of Richard Dawkin&#8217;s latest book on evolution, The Greatest Show on Earth. The review, written by Nicholas Wade, had a very troubling slant. In what I view as its most grievous error, Wade contended that Dawkins &#8220;doesn’t know what a theory is,&#8221; In saying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR flunks evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/80</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/80#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a slightly edited copy of feedback I sent to NPR earlier this week. It&#8217;s probably a bit more harsh than they deserved. But I felt I needed to do some shaking here.
&#8220;I was truly disappointed in your coverage of the Florida evolution bill issue today. Even the title of your piece, &#8216;Bill [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/80/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
