<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Slanted Viewpoint &#187; Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/category/science/evolution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint</link>
	<description>Ted Landau on Apple, politics, evolution, movies &#38; whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence, Evolution and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2011/836</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2011/836#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the most recent Sunday New York Times, Frank Bruni argues that being “smart”, at least in the scholarly academic intellectual sense that President Obama is generally considered to be smart, is not a guarantee that a President will be a strong leader, or always make wise policy decisions, or have the ability to effectively]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2011/836/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are There iPhones Elsewhere in the Universe?</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/594</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/594#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, I was immersed in the splendor of Bryce Canyon. The one word that most often cropped up whenever Park Rangers described our surroundings was &#8220;unique.&#8221; We were told how &#8220;nowhere else in the world&#8221; are the &#8220;hoodoos&#8221; (the name given to the odd rock formations that are the Park&#8217;s main attraction)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/594/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dover Trial Merits Top Ten Consideration</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/172</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/172#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having now read several &#8220;top ten news stories of the decade&#8221; lists, such as this one from the Associated Press, I was disappointed to see that one of my top choices was nowhere to be found. What is my choice? It&#8217;s the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District &#8220;evolution&#8221; trial of 2005. Without doubt, it]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/172/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicholas Wade on Evolution: Strike Two</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, the New York Times ran a review of Richard Dawkin&#8217;s latest book on evolution, The Greatest Show on Earth. The review, written by Nicholas Wade, had a very troubling slant. In what I view as its most grievous error, Wade contended that Dawkins &#8220;doesn’t know what a theory is,&#8221; In saying]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2009/88/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

