<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Slanted Viewpoint &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/category/entertainment/movies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint</link>
	<description>Ted Landau on Apple, politics, evolution, movies &#38; whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ebert Says No to 3-D; Should You?</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/410</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/410#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this week&#8217;s issue of Newsweek, Roger Ebert explains why you should &#8220;hate&#8221; 3-D movies. To be clear, he is not &#8220;opposed to 3-D as an option&#8230;but as a way of life.&#8221; That is, he is against the current marketing push to have all major studio movies made in 3-D — whether they would benefit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/410/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most logic-defying sequence in movie history</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/82</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/82#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a die-hard James Bond movie fan. And Goldfinger ranks up there as perhaps my all-time favorites James Bond film.
At least it was until I watched it again recently. I&#8217;m now thinking of downgrading it a bit.
Yes, it still has all the iconic scenes that remain so indelibly imprinted in my mind. But watching it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2008/82/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood: Give up on DRM</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2007/58</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2007/58#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2007/58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this ars technica article. It describes the lengths that Hollywood is more than willing to go to prevent piracy of its movies from Blue-Ray and HD-DVD discs. For example, to prevent such content from being copied when played on a computer, decrypted video cannot &#8220;be present on any User-Accessible Bus in analog or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2007/58/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hooray for Tom Cruise!</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2006/21</link>
		<comments>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2006/21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedmac.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2006/21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I see that Tom Cruise has landed on his feet with a new two-year deal forged with Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder.
To which I say: Fabulous. I am so glad.
First, let me say that my view of Tom Cruise&#8217;s movie career is something of a paradox.
On the one hand, I have never thought of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2006/21/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
