<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving up hope for Lost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/365/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/365</link>
	<description>Ted Landau on Apple, politics, evolution, movies &#38; whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrstphrtlbt</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/365/comment-page-1#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>chrstphrtlbt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=365#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>I truly believe that all we need is x
context. think of season 6 like the finale episode
of season 3. starts of with Jack, he&#039;s all
depressed, overlooking some coffin, trying to
commit suicide, etc. it is only the last 5 minutes, or maybe even two minutes that really make sense. Lost has always been like this. each season answers some questions but gives more again. it&#039;s always been the same, but given this was the last season everyone has been having different expectations. I think people hve hoped for the final season of lost to be different to lost somehow, but they were ever going to change

all we need is context. as soon as we work out how the sideways timeline relates to the main story now it will all come together. I truly believe we will only be satisfied until it&#039;s at the very last. every time a season ended yoi would re watch and then something else would
make complete sense to you. the lost writers are very
concerned with it being a total experience and know how dedicated the fans are, they&#039;re never going to
make it easy on us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly believe that all we need is x<br />
context. think of season 6 like the finale episode<br />
of season 3. starts of with Jack, he&#8217;s all<br />
depressed, overlooking some coffin, trying to<br />
commit suicide, etc. it is only the last 5 minutes, or maybe even two minutes that really make sense. Lost has always been like this. each season answers some questions but gives more again. it&#8217;s always been the same, but given this was the last season everyone has been having different expectations. I think people hve hoped for the final season of lost to be different to lost somehow, but they were ever going to change</p>
<p>all we need is context. as soon as we work out how the sideways timeline relates to the main story now it will all come together. I truly believe we will only be satisfied until it&#8217;s at the very last. every time a season ended yoi would re watch and then something else would<br />
make complete sense to you. the lost writers are very<br />
concerned with it being a total experience and know how dedicated the fans are, they&#8217;re never going to<br />
make it easy on us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyankboy714x</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/365/comment-page-1#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>xyankboy714x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=365#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>You make some decent points, but overall your argument is based off of few, specific, personal problems you have with the show. My first problem with your argument is that you are upset that all of the questions that you have for the show were not answered in this one episode. I think you are being a bit unreasonable considering that they needed extra time to tell Richard’s back-story. They barely had enough time to reveal things that are unrelated, such as why the dharma initiative is on the island. Clearly they have little to do with Richard’s past, so why would you be upset that it was not addressed.  I also believe that they have time to address large questions like DHARMA and I believe that the mention of Magnus Hanso (clearly related to Alvar Hanso of the Hanso Foundation) can be interpreted as a sign that this is not the last time we will hear of the Hanso name.
As for the writers pulling a fast one, I think that the writers will have to answer large questions such as the donkey wheel (too strange/important to be ignored), the numbers (now that the characters know they are assigned numbers, could be answered on Desmond’s return to the island). I think it is obvious that we must assume Jacob had a hand in everyone that came to the island (yes even DHARMA), so he must have had a hand in Desmond causing the crash of 815. There is no such thing as luck or coincidence when it comes to Jacob’s plan. I think that is one of many questions that will not be addressed because the writers assume we can draw our own conclusions. The candidate question must be addressed considering how much that word has been part of season 6 dialogue, once again too big to be ignored. I agree that time travel being unexplained is one of my biggest fears and seems quite likely. As for the food drops, if you keep up with your podcasts, you would know that Damon Lindelof said they “have every intention of answering that question”.

Charles Widmore’s intentions I think have changed for good reason. We should consider that Jacob had a hand in the freighter crew’s selection/intention (because the names of some of them were on the wall of the cave). We should also consider that Jacob could have influenced Widmore to kill Ben because he foresaw the MIB’s moves leading up to Ben murdering Jacob. Now that Jacob is dead, Widmore has no reason to kill Ben, as the damage is already done, his new main purpose is to prevent the MIB from leaving the island. I think Widmore was able to find the island in the same way that the Oceanic 6 found the island. The purpose of moving the island was to make Widmore work longer and harder to find the island again, therefore protecting the island, he knew where it was in that place so they moved it so he had to look again. The rules are also too large to ignore their origin.

I feel it is reasonable that Jacob cannot bring Isabella back from the dead, but can make Richard immortal as she is already gone and he is still present.

I believe that Richard was the first of Jacob’s people as we know them today. Prior to Richard pointing out to Jacob that just because he doesn’t intervene doesn’t mean MIB wont, Jacob tried to prove his point in the short term rather than the long-term approach. 

I think it is very possible that Isabella talking to Hurley is really Jacob, or that Jacob had a hand in her very conveniently timed appearance to Hurley, especially since Hurley’s instruction to kill the Man in Black seemed out of place with the rest of Isabella’s words, which lead me to believe they are Jacob’s words. Also referring to him as “the man in black” could be an implication that not even Richard doesn’t know his name, maybe he does not have a name. 

I think Jacob and MIB are merely eternal enemies in a constant struggle, and that is enough reason for them to try and prove their point to each other. I think that the smoke monster killed all the people on the black rock instead of Richard because he was the only slave still alive (after the others had been killed by sword wounds) that the MIB can manipulate by leaving him there for an extended time, then ultimately setting him free in exchange for killing Jacob. It absolutely could be the first time the MIB had tried to kill Jacob using someone other than himself as he could has just recently discovered this loophole. Perhaps the sword was a giveaway that Jacob was in danger as this could have been the weapon the MIB used to kill him previously. The man in black is not trying to prove a point, he is just trying to leave the island. I think Jacob believes his intervening would disprove his point as he says they have to do it on their own. And that this is the beginning of his long-term plan.
If anything I see Ab Aterno as a promise that more answers are on the way. The writers clearly have to do what they are best at, writing. There is obviously some place they are going. We all know they are too smart to let down their fans. They just need time to tell the story, they cant just read off a list of answers, which would not be television, and would definitely not be LOST. As that time runs out we will receive answers to more and more questions. Also it is naïve to think that all answers would be answered completely. Having one rigid viewpoint of all mysteries would be boring and unsatisfying as an overall end to the show. There clearly has to be some interpretation factor, some people will be upset with this, but ultimately it will allow everyone to view the show from their own perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some decent points, but overall your argument is based off of few, specific, personal problems you have with the show. My first problem with your argument is that you are upset that all of the questions that you have for the show were not answered in this one episode. I think you are being a bit unreasonable considering that they needed extra time to tell Richard’s back-story. They barely had enough time to reveal things that are unrelated, such as why the dharma initiative is on the island. Clearly they have little to do with Richard’s past, so why would you be upset that it was not addressed.  I also believe that they have time to address large questions like DHARMA and I believe that the mention of Magnus Hanso (clearly related to Alvar Hanso of the Hanso Foundation) can be interpreted as a sign that this is not the last time we will hear of the Hanso name.<br />
As for the writers pulling a fast one, I think that the writers will have to answer large questions such as the donkey wheel (too strange/important to be ignored), the numbers (now that the characters know they are assigned numbers, could be answered on Desmond’s return to the island). I think it is obvious that we must assume Jacob had a hand in everyone that came to the island (yes even DHARMA), so he must have had a hand in Desmond causing the crash of 815. There is no such thing as luck or coincidence when it comes to Jacob’s plan. I think that is one of many questions that will not be addressed because the writers assume we can draw our own conclusions. The candidate question must be addressed considering how much that word has been part of season 6 dialogue, once again too big to be ignored. I agree that time travel being unexplained is one of my biggest fears and seems quite likely. As for the food drops, if you keep up with your podcasts, you would know that Damon Lindelof said they “have every intention of answering that question”.</p>
<p>Charles Widmore’s intentions I think have changed for good reason. We should consider that Jacob had a hand in the freighter crew’s selection/intention (because the names of some of them were on the wall of the cave). We should also consider that Jacob could have influenced Widmore to kill Ben because he foresaw the MIB’s moves leading up to Ben murdering Jacob. Now that Jacob is dead, Widmore has no reason to kill Ben, as the damage is already done, his new main purpose is to prevent the MIB from leaving the island. I think Widmore was able to find the island in the same way that the Oceanic 6 found the island. The purpose of moving the island was to make Widmore work longer and harder to find the island again, therefore protecting the island, he knew where it was in that place so they moved it so he had to look again. The rules are also too large to ignore their origin.</p>
<p>I feel it is reasonable that Jacob cannot bring Isabella back from the dead, but can make Richard immortal as she is already gone and he is still present.</p>
<p>I believe that Richard was the first of Jacob’s people as we know them today. Prior to Richard pointing out to Jacob that just because he doesn’t intervene doesn’t mean MIB wont, Jacob tried to prove his point in the short term rather than the long-term approach. </p>
<p>I think it is very possible that Isabella talking to Hurley is really Jacob, or that Jacob had a hand in her very conveniently timed appearance to Hurley, especially since Hurley’s instruction to kill the Man in Black seemed out of place with the rest of Isabella’s words, which lead me to believe they are Jacob’s words. Also referring to him as “the man in black” could be an implication that not even Richard doesn’t know his name, maybe he does not have a name. </p>
<p>I think Jacob and MIB are merely eternal enemies in a constant struggle, and that is enough reason for them to try and prove their point to each other. I think that the smoke monster killed all the people on the black rock instead of Richard because he was the only slave still alive (after the others had been killed by sword wounds) that the MIB can manipulate by leaving him there for an extended time, then ultimately setting him free in exchange for killing Jacob. It absolutely could be the first time the MIB had tried to kill Jacob using someone other than himself as he could has just recently discovered this loophole. Perhaps the sword was a giveaway that Jacob was in danger as this could have been the weapon the MIB used to kill him previously. The man in black is not trying to prove a point, he is just trying to leave the island. I think Jacob believes his intervening would disprove his point as he says they have to do it on their own. And that this is the beginning of his long-term plan.<br />
If anything I see Ab Aterno as a promise that more answers are on the way. The writers clearly have to do what they are best at, writing. There is obviously some place they are going. We all know they are too smart to let down their fans. They just need time to tell the story, they cant just read off a list of answers, which would not be television, and would definitely not be LOST. As that time runs out we will receive answers to more and more questions. Also it is naïve to think that all answers would be answered completely. Having one rigid viewpoint of all mysteries would be boring and unsatisfying as an overall end to the show. There clearly has to be some interpretation factor, some people will be upset with this, but ultimately it will allow everyone to view the show from their own perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papaKin</title>
		<link>http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/index.php/archives/2010/365/comment-page-1#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>papaKin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedlandau.com/slantedviewpoint/?p=365#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to find myself in the same boat. While I still enjoy watching this show, I am gradually realizing the BIG questions I have are never going to be answered to my satisfaction. The biggest issues I have are with the story arcs of previous seasons not making any sense in context to what we know now. How the hell do you explain DHARMA/Others now? What was the significance of Christian Shepard appearing to Michael on the freighter before he blew up? (Like you mentioned) What was the purpose of Locke moving the island when everyone is back to where they were to begin with (including Widmore)? Ugh. I know I should wait to judge till the finale, but I&#039;m starting to believe they never really had most of these answers to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to find myself in the same boat. While I still enjoy watching this show, I am gradually realizing the BIG questions I have are never going to be answered to my satisfaction. The biggest issues I have are with the story arcs of previous seasons not making any sense in context to what we know now. How the hell do you explain DHARMA/Others now? What was the significance of Christian Shepard appearing to Michael on the freighter before he blew up? (Like you mentioned) What was the purpose of Locke moving the island when everyone is back to where they were to begin with (including Widmore)? Ugh. I know I should wait to judge till the finale, but I&#8217;m starting to believe they never really had most of these answers to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

